 | | Re: 6085 Black Monarch's Castle compared with 6091 King Leo's Castle
|
|
(...) Then let 'em come & abuse me for such unnecessary cross-posting 8?) (...) And I didn't thank you for the review either! ROSCO (24 years ago, 2-Oct-01, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: 6085 Black Monarch's Castle compared with 6091 King Leo's Castle
|
|
(...) A nut? There exists a long tradition of proving that old is better than new... (...) [snip] (...) [snip] (...) [snip] (...) So, you bought it, built it (& discovered missing parts), modified it, displayed it (for a week), let other people play (...) (24 years ago, 1-Oct-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.loc.au)
|
| |
| | Re: 6085 Black Monarch's Castle compared with 6091 King Leo's Castle
|
|
(...) Actually, I also called you "crazy Kerry" -- but I meant it in a friendly way. I call everyone here a "lugnut" including myself (for reasons that should be obvious). If you buy lego as an adult I should think being called a "nut" is just par (...) (24 years ago, 1-Oct-01, to lugnet.reviews)
|
| |
| | Re: 6085 Black Monarch's Castle compared with 6091 King Leo's Castle
|
|
(...) I've kind of noticed this trend over the last 6-12 months, and I'm not sure if I'm alarmed by it or not... More and more I'll find very interesting posts in the lugnet.loc.* and lugnet.org.* groups that really "belong" (or I should say "would (...) (24 years ago, 1-Oct-01, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: 6085 Black Monarch's Castle compared with 6091 King Leo's Castle
|
|
Thanks for the review and comparison. I've been considering getting a 6085, and I've also been keeping a wary eye on 6091 if I can find it at extreme discount. Anyway, I found your comments helpful. If you (or anyone) can make a comparison of the (...) (24 years ago, 1-Oct-01, to lugnet.reviews)
|
