To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.reviewsOpen lugnet.reviews in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Reviews / *1072 (-5)
  Re: Plane Sailing? (was Re: 10024Red Baron)
 
(...) Having carefully guarded the safety of my only brown LEGO brand common or garden shovel, I had a minor, completely non-swoosh testing related accident, wherein a partially completed house and fairly large backyard was dropped on the Red Baron (...) (21 years ago, 31-Aug-03, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.loc.au, FTX)
 
  Re: Plane Sailing? (was Re: 10024Red Baron)
 
(...) But of course that would be a case of using "non" aircraft parts on an aircraft! Having worked on aircraft for 8 years I can tell you that is a little bit of a no-no (only a little bit, as fencing wire 'was' considered ok on early planes, ie (...) (21 years ago, 30-Aug-03, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.loc.au)
 
  Re: Plane Sailing? (was Re: 10024Red Baron)
 
(...) Yes, I beliewe the Wright Flyer would have serious difficulties completing your test program. My initial testing sofar has proven very unsuccesfull. There will also be a slight problem with the ground strafing manouver, unless of course a (...) (21 years ago, 29-Aug-03, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.loc.au, FTX)
 
  Re: Plane Sailing? (was Re: 10024Red Baron)
 
(...) Definitely. I don't have a Wright Flyer to test at the moment (donations cheerfully accepted, though!). As soon as I do, rest assured that I will subject it to the standard array of swooshability tests, and report the results. I do not have (...) (21 years ago, 28-Aug-03, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.loc.au, FTX)
 
  Re: Plane Sailing? (was Re: 10024Red Baron)
 
(...) Any plans on updating with data for the 10124 Wright Flyer? Martin (21 years ago, 28-Aug-03, to lugnet.reviews, lugnet.loc.au)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR