To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.publish.htmlOpen lugnet.publish.html in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Publishing / HTML / 401
400  |  402
Subject: 
Re: New homepage for LUGNET
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general
Date: 
Sat, 21 Feb 2004 00:25:48 GMT
Viewed: 
54 times
  
In lugnet.admin.general, Mike Thorn wrote:
   Re: the logofest: I think like Erik said, we need to be byte-concious. I think a goal should be to keep the entire frontpage loading size to 100KB or less.

I was thinking more like 50KB or less. The current homepage weighs in at 44.2KB, of which 27.7KB of this is images. It’s pretty easy to keep small images down to 1 or 2 KB each (or even less) if care is taken. Many of the LUGNET toolbar icons are 0.2 to 0.5 KB.

   That will keep loading time for dialups at around two seconds and for 33KB/sec’ers that’ll be around four seconds. The average user will find a different website if the page takes longer than twelve seconds to load.

So if it takes eleven seconds to load, they stay, and if it takes thirteen seconds to load, they bolt?

I think what actually matters is how quickly the first approximation to the final rendered page appears. When the width and height attributes of all the image tags are set properly, the body text of the page loads almost immediately, followed by the images over the next few seconds (on a slow connection). The difference between 4 seconds and 10 seconds is minor if you immediately see content that you can begin reading and if it’s obvious that the images will finish loading an a finite amount of time. That said, I agree that faster is always better.

   I don’t know what kind of traffic LUGNET gets,

Currently about 70 GB/month.

   but I don’t think the front page should be slow to load. If anything I think it should be the fastest thing - after all, it’s really only an umpteen-way intersection.

Fast is good :) but there will always be text-only pages on the site that are still faster.

   Usually when someone arrives at a website, their eye movement starts at the center of the page, then makes a large circle outward from about 9 o’clock.

Interesting...I’ve never heard that. Is that information from a study of end-users of a variety of different websites?

--Todd



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: New homepage for LUGNET
 
(...) Excellent. I just did a homepage image count and found six, including the BrickFest logo. If we were to have button links for a bunch of major sites, this could get heavy fast. That's why I aimed at 100KB - but the lower the better. (...) (...) (21 years ago, 21-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: New homepage for LUGNET
 
(...) I agree with Frank here 100%. Not everybody has Javascript enabled, and if they have to fool around with their browser settings every time they want to visit, that'll drive people away if nothing will. Showers are great places for thinking. (...) (21 years ago, 20-Feb-04, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.publish.html, lugnet.general, FTX)

144 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR