 | | Re: HTML Question —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) Minor nit I just caught... This page, under the terms of use, is reachable from ANY page that uses the backgrounds that is in compliance with the terms of use, such as ANY of my pages. (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: HTML Question —David Blomberg
|
| | | | Just out of curiousity... why are the limitations to the lego backgrounds so restrictive? Specifically- why do these two restrictions exist: 5. You may use only one of these images per HTML document. 6. You may not alter these binary image files in (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: HTML Question —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | I'll let Todd comment authoritatively, it's his stuff, but I do think that you raise a good point, perhaps GPL would be better suited here (it allows the sorts of mods you envision)? But his terms are easier to grok. GPL is a bit much for the (...) (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | (canceled) —David Blomberg
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: HTML Question —David Blomberg
|
| | | | I agree with your point. I should not have had an example like that... I should have just used bricks-white-40.jpg or foo.bar like Bram did. -- dave (25 years ago, 16-Jun-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
