| |
In lugnet.build, Mike Kollross wrote:
> Snippage
> >
> > I'm not trying to be a wet towel, but I've always viewed LUGnet as the 'center
> > portal' or 'hub' of the lego community--it functions as exactly that, AND a
> > discussion site. Secondly, Lugnet already fits the "concept of a LEGO site that
> > the community could truly call its own." Thirdly, LUGnet already has "the
> > involvement of the LEGO Company itself." basically, LEGOFan.net seems totally
> > redundant and *almost* feels like a slap in the face to LUGnet & Todd. HOWEVER,
> > more Lego sites are a good thing. Good Luck.
> >
> > Jeff
>
> I agree. Why not make Lugnet the single point of contact for the LEGO fan base.
> We all come here any way. LEGOfan.net sounds redundant or am I missing
> something?
>
> Mike
As central as Lugnet is to portions of the online LEGO community, I believe
there are other audiences that consider themselves LEGO fans, who would benefit
from a more structured interconnected community than Lugnet provides. It would
makes sense that Lugnet play a pivotal role in any such structure, but I know of
other audiences that would appreciate an easy-to-use, centralized organization
of LEGO fan resources.
- Kelly
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
208 Messages in This Thread:
(Inline display suppressed due to large size. Click Dots below to view.)
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
