 | | Re: DCC for the RCX
|
|
(...) Sorry... I am very stupide!!! see now... (I wasn't trying to x-post just to get more views) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: DCC for the RCX
|
|
retesting in Publish (for FTX) (...) Trains and Robotics can finally reach a common goal... :) ---...--- (...) In Other News, ---...--- (...) (URL) (...) (URL) (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) I'd like to see FTX special characters on message previews stripped. When viewing via the web interface, I see the special characters that create the formatted text. The brief message previews should be all plain text with those characters (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) My main concern is the extra time it takes to download messages containing in-line images rather than links to images. This is especially worrisome when using the Entire Thread on One Page or the This Message and its Replies on one Page (...) (21 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
~^> This time the (URL) Right Way> · Eric Sophie Can you name these People? (URL) (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.people, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
Hey! I made that! It's called the (URL) Zolqwith I like this new feature! A great day in Lugnet History! Thank you Todd· Eric Sophie (...) (URL) (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) Of course, it make perfect sense now. Its Definately Bed Time Now The novelty will wear off right? -Mike Petrucelli (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) ROFL! Hey, I could've left Henry's mugshot up there, but I thought I'd try something a bit smaller. Now just imagine the confusion I could have caused by linking to the help pages. ;) (...) -Dave (who's done experimenting for the day) (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) LOL, no... +X is what you'd have to write if you wanted to cajole a count-up list + into counting downward. If you just want a count-up list, you can use + without the X number, like this: + foo + bar + zot which results in: foo bar zot --Todd (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
| |
| | Re: Announcing FTX for discussion groups
|
|
(...) Aw, hey, man, don't do that...you're gonna make someone's brain melt. --Todd (22 years ago, 28-May-03, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
