To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.publishOpen lugnet.publish in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Publishing / 3849 (-20)
  Re: One last BrickShelf suggestion...
 
(...) <snip> (...) Leaving aside whether the suggestions are actually 'helpful' or not... Part of the community, definitely. Representative of the community, probably not. Speaking on behalf of the community, definitely not. <snip> Richie (22 years ago, 17-Dec-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: One last BrickShelf suggestion...
 
Thanks Lar... a nice and respectable response. (...) It does... but, for the record I guess, I'm not frustrated in the sense that I go around all day consumed by BrickShelf's deterioration. I do admit I'm baffled by the situation, though, and I know (...) (22 years ago, 17-Dec-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: One last BrickShelf suggestion...
 
(...) Tim, don't confuse lack of response with lack of concern. In other words, the fact that Kevin isn't responding to these threads (at the level you would prefer) does not imply that he does not care. Nor does it imply that he isn't doing (...) (22 years ago, 17-Dec-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)  
 
  Re: One last BrickShelf suggestion...
 
(...) Well, its certainly not a proven fact, but its an observed trend. See: (URL) not going to debate you on that, though, that's for sure. (...) Doesn't bother me any. (...) If it was a respectful reply, adequately addressing the concerns of those (...) (22 years ago, 17-Dec-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: One last BrickShelf suggestion...
 
(...) Why not? (And that's a serious question). (...) Fine. I'll choose to be in the free section. (...) I think that any reply from Kevin would only net him more criticism. He took a lot of criticism when the building instructions went down...but (...) (22 years ago, 17-Dec-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: One last BrickShelf suggestion...
 
(...) And nothing stops it from being a free AND paid site. Different levels of access, and the paid accounts help offset the costs of maintaining the server and connection. (...) Stuff can't be free forever. I'm not advocating BrickShelf going 100% (...) (22 years ago, 17-Dec-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: One last BrickShelf suggestion...
 
(...) Personally, I think if BrickShelf became yet another pay-for-webhosting site, it wouldn't be what it is. People put their images on BrickShelf BECAUSE it's free, and because it's nicely unlimited (save moderation). If Kevin made it a pay site, (...) (22 years ago, 17-Dec-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: One last BrickShelf suggestion...
 
(...) I'd have to compare the fee and services provided against other hosts. In general I have no problem paying for a good service. Currently, aside from the bandwidth problem, Brickshelf provides all the services I need, for the best price. (...) (...) (22 years ago, 17-Dec-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: One last BrickShelf suggestion...
 
(...) If BrickShelf started making you pay for the service of off-site deep linking, would you abandon it as well? There are (much faster, more reliable) image hosting services out there, they just cost money. -Tim (22 years ago, 17-Dec-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: One last BrickShelf suggestion...
 
(...) Hmm...I just noticed that some of my images no longer show up on my FTX site, and that Brickshelf.com didn't register on my broswer at all. (The search turned up negative. Does anyone else have trouble loading the page?) Perhaps it's just my (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: One last BrickShelf suggestion...
 
(...) I think I'd have to agree. I really do wonder how to host pictures. I tried on my personal web site, but it just isn't practical. One time I posted someone else's pictures, but had to take them down after a few days because my personal web (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: One last BrickShelf suggestion...
 
(...) Well, I for one would abandon BS if this happened, unless links from LUGNET pages were allowed (and I'd probably remove my LUGNET pages too, as they'd be even more boring without the BS pics). ROSCO (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
 
  One last BrickShelf suggestion...
 
As I've seen no substantial effort by the BrickShelf administrator to interact with the community (which is VERY eager to help) in finding a solution to BrickShelf's bandwidth problem, I will offer one final suggestion. Not having statistics in (...) (22 years ago, 16-Dec-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)  
 
  A new website with a bonus! New Movie!
 
I am pleased to announce the release of a brand new website. For those of you who are fans of The Chronicles of Ikros, this website will contain the sequel to that story. And for those of you who enjoyed viewing my previous two introduction movies, (...) (22 years ago, 15-Dec-02, to lugnet.announce, lugnet.castle, lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us.texlug, lugnet.publish)  
 
  Re: Medieval Marketplace web site is online!!!
 
The updates have been done since before Thanksgiving, but a problem I have been having with ozbricks has delayed it's upload! Now with more updates it has been posted! Look at the official post to see it!!! Jeremy E Scott MM Webmaster! (...) (22 years ago, 12-Dec-02, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.publish)
 
  Brickshelf down?
 
I'm having trouble accessing www.brickshelf.com anybody else? -JHK (22 years ago, 12-Dec-02, to lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: Questions Regarding Brickshelf
 
(...) Ooh, that would have been nice. I'm in the midst of reorganizing my gallery and I had to delete most of my gallery folders and am going through the process of re-uploading. Bruce (22 years ago, 6-Dec-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: Questions Regarding Brickshelf
 
(...) (3) and my perennial favourite - the ability to upload .tar.gz files!! ROSCO (22 years ago, 5-Dec-02, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: New Train Truck (bogie) Design
 
(...) So then I shouldn't have waited to photograph on a sunny day?...;-) Thanks for the advice, Bill. -John (22 years ago, 5-Dec-02, to lugnet.publish)
 
  Re: New Train Truck (bogie) Design
 
(...) Black is easy to photograph. What's hard to photograph is high contrast. Putting something black on a white background is high contrast. Try photographing it against a dark background. The camera should adjust the contrast and it will turn out (...) (22 years ago, 5-Dec-02, to lugnet.trains, lugnet.publish)


Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more

Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR