|
|
 | | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
| (...) Why would a company feel upset about free advertising? I mean, it is not as if the picture was in any way an insult to the ice-cream... I agree I cannot tell for sure that they *won't* feel hurt, but what I said is *it is unlikely* they'll (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
| (...) Lar, Less typing, more clicking. I want everyone to be able to see my pics soon. ;-) Jude FUT .o-t.debate cause it ain't worth it even though you are right (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
| (...) Yes you are, and yes they were. The original image had the LEGO logo in it not a parody. But even the parody is a technical violation of the fairplay document... one that lots of people do (similar parodies or distortions that is) but a (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
| (...) <SNIP> (...) <SNIP> Sorry to nit-pick, and maybe I'm just badgering the point, and maybe the images were changed before they were uploaded. But the enhanced image that I saw (as I did not look at these images until after they were re-uploaded) (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
| (...) Well, you have to figure this is Kevin's site and it is up to him to run his free site as he wishes. I have had some things not ok'ed by the mods that be. But its ok, I can live with it. The pictures of mine that were deleted were in the (...) (22 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
|
