 | | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
|
(...) wait - am I completely confused here? I thought we wanted the cgi output to NOT expire? so that "back" will show you the same page? (...) hmmm... : 13.9 Side Effects of GET and HEAD Unless the origin server explicitly prohibits the caching of (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
|
"Constantine Hannaher" <channaher@netscape.net> wrote in news:GyFAJB.490@lugnet.com... (...) then (...) The image was visible only to me and not public. (...) other (...) that (...) manufacturer (...) Look closer. The ice cream is made of bricks. If (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf
|
|
(...) I DON'T think the user gets an email saying that the folder or conetnt of the folder have been removed. I had 5 main folders in my top directory and now only 4 are there. The 1st one was a bunch of .gsd files that when merged together would (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Censorship and public relations (was: Brickshelf problems?)
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in news:GyF7IL.I35@lugnet.com... (...) for (...) Some of the best photos on brickshelf are (were?) spoofed ads or packages. I wonder why someone can show splattered, blood covered bodies of minfigs (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
|
Without knowing the details on how the moderating works, it does worry me a bit that this image was visible on Brickshelf and accessible from the Recent folder for some non-trivial length of time. In view of the massive unavailability of folders (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
