 | | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
|
(...) wait - am I completely confused here? I thought we wanted the cgi output to NOT expire? so that "back" will show you the same page? (...) hmmm... : 13.9 Side Effects of GET and HEAD Unless the origin server explicitly prohibits the caching of (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
|
"Constantine Hannaher" <channaher@netscape.net> wrote in news:GyFAJB.490@lugnet.com... (...) then (...) The image was visible only to me and not public. (...) other (...) that (...) manufacturer (...) Look closer. The ice cream is made of bricks. If (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf
|
|
(...) I DON'T think the user gets an email saying that the folder or conetnt of the folder have been removed. I had 5 main folders in my top directory and now only 4 are there. The 1st one was a bunch of .gsd files that when merged together would (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Censorship and public relations (was: Brickshelf problems?)
|
|
"Larry Pieniazek" <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in news:GyF7IL.I35@lugnet.com... (...) for (...) Some of the best photos on brickshelf are (were?) spoofed ads or packages. I wonder why someone can show splattered, blood covered bodies of minfigs (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
|
Without knowing the details on how the moderating works, it does worry me a bit that this image was visible on Brickshelf and accessible from the Recent folder for some non-trivial length of time. In view of the massive unavailability of folders (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
|
(...) Yes. A GET CGI is supposed to give the same output when it's (...) Where does it say that a GET request always returns the same content? a GET for a dynamic page is no different than a GET for a "static" page that might change at some point. (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
|
Briefly addressing a couple of things, Kevin is your authoritative source... (...) I did not delete this one. But I DID look at it pretty hard, several times and marked it "unsure" each time. NOT beccause it's porn. An image of a very pretty girl (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
|
Hi Kevin, first I want to thank you for providing the LEGO fan community a central place to exhibit their creations on unlimited free disk space. I don't want to miss it. BUT if you restrict it too hard, people are going to seek for alternatives and (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: One upside of the whole folder moderation mess....
|
|
(...) Bill, Bill, when will you learn to use your power for good, not evil? :-) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: One upside of the whole folder moderation mess....
|
|
(...) I believe this is a scan of pages from a retail guide so it is an *illustration* of how LEGO(r) *thought* the aisle should be laid out rather than an actual store. One dead givaway are the white dividing lines and numbered sections with a key (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.market.shopping)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf problems?
|
|
On a side note, are the page hit counters being updated right now? Kevin (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
|
(...) I use IE, and was quite surprised when that happened to me the first time (checking a folder and going back, just to find that another random folder appeared rather than the one I was exploring). Since then, I just open the questionable (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
|
(...) unless there's an explicit header saying the cgi has expired (which i didn't check), I say mozilla is doing the Right Thing, while IE and NS don't. A GET CGI is supposed to give the same output when it's parameters are the same, so browsers (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: One upside of the whole folder moderation mess....
|
|
(...) OMG. Assuming this is a store's Lego aisle: (URL) are some GREAT sets in that aisle! <drool> I can hardly remember a time when toy store shelves were stocked like that... :( -Bryan (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: One upside of the whole folder moderation mess....
|
|
(...) Muahahahahaa. My evil plot worked! ;-) (...) Thanks. (...) Your work for the night is done. Thanks! --Bill. (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: One upside of the whole folder moderation mess....
|
|
(...) Is now. I just walked your whole folder tree, it should all be clear to view. That PB4Y-2 is huge. Very cool. I gotta go to bed though. (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: One upside of the whole folder moderation mess....
|
|
(...) That's cool! The "Meeting the SNOT team" pictures look awfully familiar, I think they were photographed at Holger's old apartment in Moenchengladbach. I've been there! :-) (URL) isn't reviewed yet, though, so only Larry and the other (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
|
I'd just like to say again that if you (Kevin) need more free, good, help you have four ready willing and able people here. -- Thanx~ Nicole (URL) Loch" <kloch@opnsys.com> wrote in message news:GyECpE.9oM@lugnet.com... (...) structure (...) with (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
|
(...) I'm actually using IE but I'll check out Mozilla... (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?)
|
|
(...) Don't you wish all software development was this efficient? It's even written in C. Kids, don't try this at home :) BTW, you are using Mozilla 1.1a right? Besides being a far superior browser to IE or NS it has a fortuitous bug where it (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
