 | | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | (...) OOOH, good idea. I did not think of that. I guess I better go install NS then, do you have a recommendation for a good and stable and free version? Meanwhile the elves have been steadily improving the interface while I was working (I just (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?) —Kevin Loch
|
| | | | (...) Don't you wish all software development was this efficient? It's even written in C. Kids, don't try this at home :) BTW, you are using Mozilla 1.1a right? Besides being a far superior browser to IE or NS it has a fortuitous bug where it (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?) —Larry Pieniazek
|
| | | | | (...) I'm actually using IE but I'll check out Mozilla... (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?) —Dan Boger
|
| | | | | (...) unless there's an explicit header saying the cgi has expired (which i didn't check), I say mozilla is doing the Right Thing, while IE and NS don't. A GET CGI is supposed to give the same output when it's parameters are the same, so browsers (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?) —Kevin Loch
|
| | | | | | (...) Yes. A GET CGI is supposed to give the same output when it's (...) Where does it say that a GET request always returns the same content? a GET for a dynamic page is no different than a GET for a "static" page that might change at some point. (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?) —Dan Boger
|
| | | | | | (...) wait - am I completely confused here? I thought we wanted the cgi output to NOT expire? so that "back" will show you the same page? (...) hmmm... : 13.9 Side Effects of GET and HEAD Unless the origin server explicitly prohibits the caching of (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Brickshelf suggestions (was: problems?) —Richard W. Schamus
|
| | | | (...) I use IE, and was quite surprised when that happened to me the first time (checking a folder and going back, just to find that another random folder appeared rather than the one I was exploring). Since then, I just open the questionable (...) (23 years ago, 28-Jun-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
