 | | Re: Brickshelf slow?
|
|
(...) I'm not sure, but I've noticed it too. It's like I'm at home on my dial-up. -Duane (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Brickshelf slow?
|
|
Is it just me, or is Brickshelf very slow today? I wonder if Kevin has had to throttle the bandwidth to reduce the cost? --Bill. (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans are back!
|
|
Hello Mark, (...) Well, if that is what it means, this certainly differs from what I understood when I read: (...) because with property I am usually free to even sell it. Also, since we are talking intellectual property here, I thought it would (...) (23 years ago, 17-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans are back!
|
|
Oops, there was something missing in my posting here: (...) (23 years ago, 17-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans are back!
|
|
Hello Kevin, (...) I am glad to hear this from you directly. Maybe the whole issue here is that English is not my mother tongue, so I didn't get the proper meaning of the jurisdictional terms. How will you handle scans that have been uploaded before (...) (23 years ago, 17-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans are back!
|
|
(...) Read what I wrote carefully. It adresses material *submitted* to the Library. That means you have no control over what Brickshelf does with it's copies of what you submit. In other words, you can't revoke your submission, or suddenly decide (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans are back!
|
|
I'm not a lawyer, but I understand this to mean: Anything uploaded to Brickshelf, bet it scans, digital pics, gif files, text files, whatever, becomes property of Brickshelf in the regards that Brickshelf can do whatever with those files (print (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans are back!
|
|
Hello Kevin, (...) Which types of claims are you talking here? I can see that submitting does not GIVE them any rights above and beyond the ones they have, so they cannot CLAIM anything. But how could they claim any rights, from submitting to (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans are back!
|
|
Hello Dan, (...) Actually, I don't think that. (...) I agree. (...) I understand that. I don't see, however, for now, how the bill is going to be paid for from now on. But I guess Kevin has an idea ... I think I have understood more of the (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans are back!
|
|
Hello Richard, (...) I have no problem with Kevin deciding alone what to do with his copy of the scans. However, trying to exclude people who contributed the scans, which is what I understand from the sentence: is not something I will accept for the (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans are back!
|
|
Hello Larry, hello everybody, (...) I do understand by now what was going on in the last few weeks, and why. However, there hasn't been much response to my second point, which was about Brickshelf L.L.C. claiming all rights with uploaded scans: (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Keppler Industries v3.0
|
|
Do you mean the two links that don't have a button? Cause those 2 sites didn't give me a button, so it's supposed to be blank there. (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Keppler Industries v3.0
|
|
Thanks! It wasn't all the html that drove me batty, it's all the php that spits out the html that did it. (Look under other for more about that) And ja, I use Photoshop 5.5 for all my grapics except for some of the thumbs, which are made by the php (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Scans on CDROM
|
|
(...) That's an excellent idea. I hope Kevin reads this and LEGO would support it. I think $20 for such a CDROM would not be unreasonable and lots of people would happily pay it. --Bill. (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: My site is back from the dead!
|
|
(...) There are a couple of ships in there that are supposedly bad guys, but you are right- I haven't done much with storylines for my space models lately. Perhaps it is time to get back to that a bit more. (...) Hey- you did look closely! Sadly, (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: My site is back from the dead!
|
|
Hey man looks good, I don't see any baddies!! I do have a question... Did you ever finish the rest of the cargo ship that the Big Red cockpit goes to? out tk (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Keppler Industries v3.0
|
|
Kyle, I dug a bit deeper into your site and two of your banners have incomplete code you may want to fix. They are on the 'Links' page. thought you'd like to know out tk (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Keppler Industries v3.0
|
|
I like like the look, you DID put alot of time into that!!! All that html is enough to drive a man batty!! Did you use Photoshop to create your graphics? out tk (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans are back!
|
|
(...) Obviously, it's great to have the scans back and good to hear that Lego is giving permission and "generous support". But, what is not so clear to me is just how generous Lego's support is? Is it sufficient to cover all of brickshelf's volume (...) (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
| |
| | Re: Scans are back!
|
|
(...) Yes, every version of every catalog (except current vendors catalogs) are acceptable. (...) We don't currently have Mania Magazines in the collection, and I don't believe we have permission to post them. KL (23 years ago, 15-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
