|
|
 | | Re: Brickshelf slow?
|
| (...) I'm not sure, but I've noticed it too. It's like I'm at home on my dial-up. -Duane (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Brickshelf slow?
|
| Is it just me, or is Brickshelf very slow today? I wonder if Kevin has had to throttle the bandwidth to reduce the cost? --Bill. (23 years ago, 18-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Scans are back!
|
| Hello Mark, (...) Well, if that is what it means, this certainly differs from what I understood when I read: (...) because with property I am usually free to even sell it. Also, since we are talking intellectual property here, I thought it would (...) (23 years ago, 17-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Scans are back!
|
| Oops, there was something missing in my posting here: (...) (23 years ago, 17-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Scans are back!
|
| Hello Kevin, (...) I am glad to hear this from you directly. Maybe the whole issue here is that English is not my mother tongue, so I didn't get the proper meaning of the jurisdictional terms. How will you handle scans that have been uploaded before (...) (23 years ago, 17-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Scans are back!
|
| (...) Read what I wrote carefully. It adresses material *submitted* to the Library. That means you have no control over what Brickshelf does with it's copies of what you submit. In other words, you can't revoke your submission, or suddenly decide (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Scans are back!
|
| I'm not a lawyer, but I understand this to mean: Anything uploaded to Brickshelf, bet it scans, digital pics, gif files, text files, whatever, becomes property of Brickshelf in the regards that Brickshelf can do whatever with those files (print (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Scans are back!
|
| Hello Kevin, (...) Which types of claims are you talking here? I can see that submitting does not GIVE them any rights above and beyond the ones they have, so they cannot CLAIM anything. But how could they claim any rights, from submitting to (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Scans are back!
|
| Hello Dan, (...) Actually, I don't think that. (...) I agree. (...) I understand that. I don't see, however, for now, how the bill is going to be paid for from now on. But I guess Kevin has an idea ... I think I have understood more of the (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Scans are back!
|
| Hello Richard, (...) I have no problem with Kevin deciding alone what to do with his copy of the scans. However, trying to exclude people who contributed the scans, which is what I understand from the sentence: is not something I will accept for the (...) (23 years ago, 16-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
|
