|
|
 | | Re: Scans are back!
|
| (...) I think Kevin gets this privilege de facto because he is the one maintaining the library. That some other person(s) should have a backed up copy of the library would probably be prudent and has hopefully already been accomplished. (...) I (...) (23 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Scans are back!
|
| (...) Ouch! The zipfiles were THE manner in which I would view instruction manuals. If the zipfiles were too much hassle bandwidth-wise, how about making cd-roms of the library available for sale to fund the library? If I could get the extant (...) (23 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Scans are back!
|
| (...) I agree, and further, the people here jiggling his elbow (including, regrettably, me) while he was engaged in what had to be delicate negotiations probably weren't helping matters with their thoughts, analysis and suggestions although surely (...) (23 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Scans are back!
|
| (...) Personally, I think Kevin did the right thing. And he gets extra points from doing it on his own. Why do you think that he should have waited for LEGO to complain? The fact that he probably _could_ get away with it doesn't mean he _should_ (...) (23 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Scans are back!
|
| Hello Kevin, hello everybody, I certainly appreciate the enormous amount of work that you and others put into brickshelf over the years, and the value this has created for the LEGO community. This is why I found it very disturbing to see the LEGO(r) (...) (23 years ago, 14-Mar-02, to lugnet.publish)
|
|
