| | 
      |  |  | In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes: > [reposted with corrections]
 >
 >
 > In lugnet.admin.general, Ben Gatrelle writes:
 > > Doesn't the server do it because you have told it WRAP=HARD.
 >
 > Is that a delcarative or interrogative statement?  :-)
 It is a retorical interrogative statement of what I thought was the truth.
 ;) Apparently it is not truth, though...
 
 > No, the client (web browser) is doing the line breaking.  The WRAP=HARD
 > attribute of <TEXTAREA> asks the web browser client to wrap the user's text
 > at the COLS=n margin *before* sending it to the server.  And I just double-
 > checked in the raw incoming posting form logs for the relevant URLs below to
 > make sure that this is the case here -- it's not breaking the lines on the
 > server end.
 >
 >
 > > Here is a web-interface post from June where the line break was automatically
 > > entered at the ? in the URL <http://news.lugnet.com/market/auction/?n=6089>
 >
 > That would be happening at the client side.  But I'll check the raw incoming
 > form logs...  OK, ya, your web client (browser) sent it line-broken after
 > the ? in the URL for some strange reason probably only Bill Gates knows.  :-)
 >
 >
 > > This post was broken at the 79th character and was sent in through email
 > > <http://news.lugnet.com/market/auction/?n=6123>
 >
 > In my opinion, that is a godawful evil bug in your email client.  Hmm...It
 > says it was mailed using "Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)".
 > Is there a newer version without the wrapping bug?  Had you asked your mail
 > client to break lines like that?  Maybe it has an option to shut the forced
 > breaking off.  The email client broke a word into two words! -- this time not
 > even at a punctuation character.  That's pretty bad -- you should report that
 > to your software vendor and ask them to fix it.  (Send yourself an equivalent
 > mail first of course to verify it in case I'm wrong.  :-)  I'll look into this. I don't believe I have any settig for length of a line.
 >
 > > Here is a test post I just did through the web-intterface showing broken
 > > URLs.  <http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/test/?n=2388>
 > >
 > > I use IE5.x for my browser and Outlook 2000 for mail.
 >
 > That's evil.  OK, MSIE isn't handling WRAP=HARD the same was Netscape and
 > Mozilla handle it.
 
 I just launched my Netscape navigator 4 and replied to the test message
 above. I made sure to delete the hard breaks that were there and the result
 is the same in Nav4 as my previous post via IE5.
 See <http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/test/?n=2389>
 
 > Let's try this:  I'll have the server send out WRAP=SOFT if it your browser
 > identifies itself as "MSIE" in its user-agent string, otherwise it'll send
 > out WRAP=HARD as normal.
 >
 > Is that better now or worse?  It should be better, and you should be able
 > to post your long eBay URLs now.
 
 Better. See <http://news.lugnet.com/off-topic/test/?n=2390>. Now it does not
 wrap at all, but rather it extends the width of the table cell in which the
 text is displayed. What I should have done was type a long parapraph like
 this one also to see if this wraps automatically at the end of a word at
 character 76 or 77 like you said it should.
 > --Todd
 >
 > Here's a great page, BTW -- one for the bookmarks!...
 > http://www.hut.fi/u/jkorpela/forms/textarea.html
 >
 > What does your browser do with the "Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious"
 > example when you click View?
 Results:
 default
 Superclifragilisticexpialidocious.
 hard
 Supercalifragilistic
 expialidocious.
 off
 Supercalifragilisticexpialidocious.
 
 
 BEN
 
 |  |  |  
 
 Message has 1 Reply:
 
 Message is in Reply To:
 
 6 Messages in This Thread:
 
          
    
 
      Entire Thread on One Page:
      
        Nested: 
        All | Brief | Compact | Dots
        Linear: 
        All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
 Nested: 
        All | Brief | Compact | Dots
        Linear: 
        All | Brief | Compact
 | 
 | 
 | 
 |