|
|
 | | Challenge: Fun with pictures!
|
| Here is a fun challenge - make the most out of this picture using your computer. (URL) catch - the dragon has to be blowing fire, acid, or whatever you see fit at the soldier. It has to be a direct hit as well. I'm going to go back and try to redo (...) (25 years ago, 26-Sep-00, to lugnet.castle, lugnet.general, lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Neo Plastics
|
| (...) Oh, yeah, me too on the me too. Like the models, hate the html. :-, Cheers, - jsproat (25 years ago, 25-Sep-00, to lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Resolved: Yahoo is good for the 'net (was Re: Lego Maniac's Webring and Yahoo
|
| (...) Sure, and then when someone clicks "next" or "previous" for that Ring ID, the Yahoo! server sees that the corresponding JS code for that Ring ID and Site ID hasn't been fetched recently by that IP address, and it gacks (by design) and it sends (...) (25 years ago, 23-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Resolved: Yahoo is good for the 'net (was Re: Lego Maniac's Webring and Yahoo
|
| Right, but once Yahoo has spit out that content, you save it, and modify it any way you want to. (...) -- Tom Stangl ***(URL) Visual FAQ home ***(URL) Bay Area DSMs (25 years ago, 23-Sep-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Transclusion via JavaScript (was: Re: Resolved: Yahoo is good for the 'net)
|
| "Todd Lehman" <lehman@javanet.com> wrote in message news:G1Cpxr.Cqt@lugnet.com... [snip] (...) they (...) [script snipped] (...) had (...) JS (...) I'd (...) of (...) nasties. This is exactly what I do to generate my pages. My provider doesn't (...) (25 years ago, 23-Sep-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
|
