Subject:
|
Re: MOC: Dragoons, digitally photographed
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Mon, 10 Jan 2000 07:15:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
585 times
|
| |
| |
I'm very interested in your photography techniques!
What are the zoom and macro capabilities of your Nikon, if I may ask? I'm
looking for a good digital camera that can handle objects closer than the
standard 10 inches.
--
Paul Davidson
craig hamilton <craigo-lego@webtv.net> wrote in message
news:Fo3os3.7rs@lugnet.com...
>
> beautiful job on the painting, jeff! those are some great looking 'figs
> and the gold trim details are especially nice!
>
> later ~ craig~
>
> In lugnet.castle, Jeff Johnston writes:
> > (Please note the crosspost - trim your groups when replying! Comments about
> > the 'figs should got to .castle, comments about the photography or the camera
> > to .publish)
> >
> > Well, I went out and got a digital camera today...finally. It came down to
> > the Sony Mavica FD83 and the Nikon Coolpix 800. (Castle readers, don't worry,
> > there _is_ a reason this is in the group.)
> >
> > Both cameras were great - the Sony especially is very friendly and easy to use
> > - but I decided to go with the Nikon's higher resolution (1600x1200) and a
> > feature set that was more likely to be useful to me.
> >
> > Anyway, I'm very pleased with my choice, and I've put up a couple of pictures
> > I took tonight at my LEGO site. (The address is in my .sig.) The pics are of
> > some modified minifigs I made a month or so ago, inspired by the Final Fantasy
> > series of games. (I figured Castle was the most appropriate LEGO theme.) I'm
> > really pleased with how they turned out (both the figs and the pics.)
> >
> > On the page, I included some basic information on the photography conditions -
> > lighting and such - is this sort of stuff helpful to people? Should I
> > continue
> > to include it in other MOC sections I put up? Or is it just more useless info
> > cluttering up the page? Is there other information that would be helpful?
> > Distance from camera to figs, ISO eqivalent of the picture, that sort of thing?
> > If there is, let me know.
> >
> > J
> >
> > --
> > sakura@mediaone.net is Jeff Johnston http://www.io.com/~jeffj
> > My LEGO Web page has moved! Go to: http://people.ne.mediaone.net/sakura
> > Check out my Trade List and Want List - * - Last Updated 12/19/1999
> > LEGO Geek Code: SP+ CA +++ (375/6075) PI +++ #++ S--/++ LS++ Hal M+ A++
YB73m
|
|
Message has 3 Replies: | | Re: MOC: Dragoons, digitally photographed
|
| (...) Well, let's see...the CP800 has a 2x optical zoom and a 2.5x digital zoom. When I took those pics, I was basically holding the camera about 4" away from the 'figs. I haven't really checked exactly how close you can get and still focus, though. (...) (25 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.publish)
| | | Re: MOC: Dragoons, digitally photographed
|
| (...) This is what I've been waiting for. Hoping to find some reviews of it soon. (URL) The parts you want and nothing else? (URL) - Just Another Brick Auction Why pay eBay? Run your own LEGO auctions for free! (URL) (25 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.publish)
| | | Re: MOC: Dragoons, digitally photographed
|
| (...) I have the Coolpix 950 and love it. It does 3x optical zoom (and some sort of digital zoom, which is mostly useless unless you're really short of space on your memory card and need a cropped shot) and the macro mode is 0.8 inches to infinity. (25 years ago, 10-Jan-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
11 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|