|
|
 | | Re: MOCpages Down for the Count?
|
| (...) Still, I think at least they have more of a right to complain than those who aren't paying... erm... DONATING at all! Legoswami (20 years ago, 11-May-05, to lugnet.publish.html, FTX)
| | | | | Re: MOCpages Down for the Count?
|
| (...) I had noticed some passing remarks as well, but a search on lugnet did not reveal a thread talking about it. I've been checking MOCpages three of four times a day for about a week. I never got through. (...) I tried an email to his (...) (20 years ago, 11-May-05, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
| | | | | Re: MOCpages Down for the Count?
|
| (...) Good point. I'll go further, even donors shouldn't complain!(1) But then I'm a donor and I'm not complaining, just asking. Just like Jason is, I think, wondering what's up. 1 - it's a donation, not a contract (20 years ago, 11-May-05, to lugnet.publish.html, FTX)
| | | | | Re: MOCpages Down for the Count?
|
| (...) It has been remarked on in passing and I've certainly noticed it. I did not realise it was solidly never working though. (...) Not directly. I'm wondering if a note directly to Mr. Kenney might be productive?? (...) Hints on that appreciated, (...) (20 years ago, 11-May-05, to lugnet.general, lugnet.publish, FTX)
| | | | | Re: MOCpages Down for the Count?
|
| (...) Odd, I only noticed the 'very high traffic' one. (...) Yup. And *now* I'm getting worried. You're right, it's been a month. I haven't mailed Sean Kenney about it, so I haven't (...) The way I see it, (and I've mentioned this before): It's a (...) (20 years ago, 11-May-05, to lugnet.publish.html, FTX)
|
|
