|
|
 | | LENNI Specification v0.2 Request For Comment
|
| Thanks so far to everyone who's participated in the LEGO Enthusiast News Network Initiative (LENNI) discussions. I've gotten a very clear idea of what types of things should be in this proposal, and have completed the draft of version 0.2, which is (...) (20 years ago, 12-Sep-04, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.announce, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Another LENNI Question (geek alert)
|
| (...) Right, no need to force software updates every time we add to the list. Hopefully it'll be all back-end. My only real concern right now would be how stable is XSD? I keep running across people trashing it on the various blog sites. But I don't (...) (20 years ago, 12-Sep-04, to lugnet.publish)
| | | | | Re: Another LENNI Question (geek alert)
|
| (...) I like this solution. The schema can be used not only for validation, but can be pulled to get the list of possible values. Quick question though - can't the list of allowed values be specified in the DTD, which we're going to maintain anyway? (...) (20 years ago, 11-Sep-04, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek)
| | | | | Another LENNI Question (geek alert)
|
| Next techie question for LENNI… including semi-dynamic options for filters. OK, now that I've gotten a pretty good idea of what to do with the LENNI spec (which should have a v0.2 draft this weekend), the one big question that is still bugging me is (...) (20 years ago, 9-Sep-04, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.geek, FTX)
| | | | | Re: Whats up with BrickShelf mods?
|
| (...) No it doesn't help because it doesn't explain these two recently approved folders. (URL) (20 years ago, 5-Sep-04, to lugnet.publish, FTX)
|
|
