Subject:
|
Re: Question about frigates
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.pirates
|
Date:
|
Tue, 7 Mar 2000 17:56:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2931 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Mr L F Braun (<38C53F44.D944207C@pilot.msu.edu>)
wrote at 17:41:24
>
>
> Tony Priestman wrote:
>
> > Can anyone give me a quick answer to this:
> >
> > How many cannon does a ship have to have to be considered a frigate?
> >
> > Or let me put it another way:
> >
> > Is 24 or 26 going to be enough?
>
> As far as I know, it depends on how many cannon a ship is designed to
> carry. I think that 28 or 32 was the standard minimum as of 1800; I
> don't know of too many with fewer cannon.
Hmmm. This is what I thought.
Need a longer ship :(
--
Tony Priestman
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Question about frigates
|
| (...) As far as I know, it depends on how many cannon a ship is designed to carry. I think that 28 or 32 was the standard minimum as of 1800; I don't know of too many with fewer cannon. On the other hand, the Humphreys frigates in the US did carry (...) (27 years ago, 7-Mar-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
9 Messages in This Thread:
  
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
