|
|
 | | Re: John E. Doolittle.
|
| On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Richard Parsons (<FoBLH7.DHF@lugnet.com>) wrote at 10:13:06 (...) Given that this is an imaginary world, I have no problem with either, and can see advantages in either spelling. I can see where you're coming from completely, (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
| | | | | Port Block, busted link
|
| The URL I've been posting in my sig for the past week or so is a dud (sorry). Port Block is moving a little bit over the next month, and some dufus (me) used an incomplete URL in the sig. Its fixed now. Hmmm, this might be a good time for you guys (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
| | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle.
|
| Mr L F Braun wrote in (...) rather than the colonial 'Brikish' :-) (...) Colonial degeneralities (oooh, a neologism, ™ me, oh yeah). Ardour, candour, endeavour, and/our...hmm, that last one sounds a bit funny, but the others are aboot right. Now, (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
| | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle,
|
| Mr L F Braun wrote in message <387E6DA4.CB015F6F@p...su.edu>... (...) compiling so long ago, on 5 January 1999? Got it. Killed it dead ;-) Richard Still baldly going... Check out Port Block at (URL) the change in URL - Port Block is moving over the (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
| | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle,
|
| Timothy D. Freshly wrote in message ... (...) happily-married one at that) Forget about ad-hoc advice - you want to be writing a book for lawyers! A happily married lawyer....... So like, wow ;-) I'll have to go back and look at whether I can work (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
|
