|
|
 | | Re: John E. Doolittle.
|
| (...) Why wouldn't I? I'm a Bricki...er, British historian, not prone to Colonial degeneralities (oooh, a neologism, ™ me, oh yeah). Ardour, candour, endeavour, and/our...hmm, that last one sounds a bit funny, but the others are aboot (1) right. (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
| | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle.
|
| On Fri, 14 Jan 2000, Mr L F Braun (<387E6CA9.1DB73BA2@....msu.edu>) wrote at 00:24:09 (...) Hee hee! Glad to see you're using the Brickish version of the word, rather than the colonial 'Brikish' :-) BTW, Great Brickain is (c) me 1999: (URL) lying (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
| | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle.
|
| (...) Employment (...) Heh... Just call it a Y2K bug... everyone else is using it <grin> James (URL) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
| | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle,
|
| Hi, By the way, just a potential "checkbook" oops--did the story begin compiling so long ago, on 5 January 1999? Just saw it on the page and was curious. It all looks magnificent, though--and the story holds together nicely. That Johnny Thunder (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
| | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle.
|
| (...) Yeah--it's understandable. Granted, if I made that particular gaffe at *any* time of day, I'd probably be forced to turn in my Imperial Historian Employment Card. Let's hope they don't find out about my "Boer War starting in 1999" ooops. (...) (26 years ago, 14-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
|
