 | | Re: John E. Doolittle. —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | (...) "What kind of party pirates be ye, ya silly nits? I TOLD ye to spike the PUNCH, not the guns!" An alleged pirate-type but not until ye prove it in court or I'll have a personal-injury anti-defamation suit slapped on you so fast.... (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle. —Timothy D. Freshly
|
| | | | | Bruce Schlickbernd <corsair@schlickbernd.org> wrote in message news:Fo6HLL.8wK@lugnet.com... (...) all? (...) clipping (...) And I think I know a certain parrot who would be willing to advise you on your case... Tim (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle. —Richard Parsons
|
| | | | | | Timothy D. Freshly wrote in message ... (...) For a fee perhaps. I mean, Impunity may be a parrot, and a pretty stupid one at that, but he's still a lawyer ;-) Richard Still baldly going... Check out Port Block at (URL) the change in URL - Port (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle, page updated —Richard Parsons
|
| | | | | | Gentlemen (and others ;-) Timothy Freshly has joined the writer's guild. Still a few empty chairs at the authors' table, and plenty of rum. (URL) baldly going... Check out Port Block at (URL) the change in URL - Port Block is moving over the next (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle, page updated —Timothy D. Freshly
|
| | | | | | I am honored. Thank you. On to another suggestion. As you have already set out in the story, Doolittle sends money back to his wife in England to provide for her. However, her affair with Waite becomes more public, eventually reaching the ears of (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle, —Richard Parsons
|
| | | | | | Timothy D. Freshly wrote another worthy sub-plot element. Minor mods makes this "Aurora gently tells Doolittle of his wife's infidelity. In the best traditions of the understanding male, Doolittle repressed his hurt feelings, saw his wife's issues (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle, —Timothy D. Freshly
|
| | | | | | | Richard Parsons <rparsons@hinet.net.au> wrote in message news:Fo9xuw.EpC@lugnet.com... [snip] (...) giving (...) a (...) I guess this comes from me actually being an attorney (and a happily-married one at that). Chalk one literary idea to the (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle, —Bruce Schlickbernd
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) But OF COURSE Lawyers give marital advice, and it's always the same: GET A DIVORCE! I mean, how the heck can lawyers make money otherwise? It wasn't much of a career change to go from Lawyer to Pirate, after all. (oooOOOOoooOOOOOooo, I'm a bad (...) (25 years ago, 13-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle, —Richard Parsons
|
| | | | | | | | Timothy D. Freshly wrote in message ... (...) happily-married one at that) Forget about ad-hoc advice - you want to be writing a book for lawyers! A happily married lawyer....... So like, wow ;-) I'll have to go back and look at whether I can work (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle, —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | Hi, By the way, just a potential "checkbook" oops--did the story begin compiling so long ago, on 5 January 1999? Just saw it on the page and was curious. It all looks magnificent, though--and the story holds together nicely. That Johnny Thunder (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle, —Richard Parsons
|
| | | | | | Mr L F Braun wrote in message <387E6DA4.CB015F6F@p...su.edu>... (...) compiling so long ago, on 5 January 1999? Got it. Killed it dead ;-) Richard Still baldly going... Check out Port Block at (URL) the change in URL - Port Block is moving over the (...) (25 years ago, 14-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle. —Tony Priestman
|
| | | | | On Tue, 11 Jan 2000, Bruce Schlickbernd (<Fo6HLL.8wK@lugnet.com>) wrote at 15:56:09 (...) Arr, they're a rum lot! But at least they're not your here toddy, gone tomorrow buccaneers. 'Where's your buccaneers?' (25 years ago, 11-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: John E. Doolittle. —Richard Parsons
|
| | | | Bruce Schlickbernd indicated that he was (...) Now it seems to me that there is an opening here for a bright, technically able parrot to make quite a tidy living out of this sort of behaviour. Impunity might end up hanging out a shingle. Richard (...) (25 years ago, 12-Jan-00, to lugnet.pirates)
|
| | | | |
