 | | Choosing a Digital Camera/New Photos Up —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | All- Well, I went out and found a camera that was under $200. It's only 850K pixels, but it seems to work all right, and what's more it's in colour and it's no worse than my horrible film photography. At least this way I don't waste film or time. (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-99, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.publish)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Choosing a Digital Camera/New Photos Up —Tony Priestman
|
| | | | | On Sat, 4 Dec 1999, Mr L F Braun (<3848B160.33487CE2@....msu.edu>) wrote at 06:14:57 (...) I'm considering getting one purely for putting stuff on the web. Surely 850k is plenty big enough? It's all I was going to get. (25 years ago, 4-Dec-99, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Choosing a Digital Camera/New Photos Up —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | Mr L F Braun wrote in message <3848B160.33487CE2@p...su.edu>... (...) Picture quality looks pretty good. One thing you do need to do is either not use lights so the camera will use it's flash, or get yourself some photo floods. A tripod might help (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-99, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Choosing a Digital Camera/New Photos Up —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | (...) I've thought of a tripod, just for stability's sake--I have arthritis and it's bad enough that I just can't elminiate camera shake. (...) It's a Fuji DX-10; CompUSA has them for $199 right now (but there are no rainchecks, and when they're (...) (25 years ago, 4-Dec-99, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Choosing a Digital Camera/New Photos Up —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | Mr L F Braun wrote in message <38496885.5739D2F4@p...su.edu>... (...) not (...) it's (...) You can get a decent tripon for about $20. Unfortuanately it won't totally eliminate camera shake unless your camera has a remote. The tripod will hold the (...) (25 years ago, 5-Dec-99, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Choosing a Digital Camera/New Photos Up —Tamyra Teed
|
| | | | | | | (...) The only thing I don't like about the mavica is if you aren't under florescent or halogen lights (which btw turn blonde hair green in photos) you aren't going to get that great of a shot indoors even with the flash, it's too hot. I have to (...) (25 years ago, 5-Dec-99, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Choosing a Digital Camera/New Photos Up —Ray Sanders
|
| | | | | | | | | I use the original Kodak DC-200 (not even a plus). Several tricks I have found: I keep a little piece of wax paper taped over the flash (it helps difuse it a bit) I always take the box shots at highest-res, then set my html to display them at 50% (...) (25 years ago, 7-Dec-99, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | Re: Choosing a Digital Camera/New Photos Up —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | | | Well, I thought I was all settled on a Mavica, then I stopped in Service Merchandise today. They actually had cameras in stock, and in addition to the Mavica had an Olympus D-450ZOOM 1280x960 w/3x optical zoom. So far, looks like a nice camera. (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Choosing a Digital Camera/New Photos Up —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | | | | | | (...) Yeah, I'd like to see some of your vaunted creations! :) Always the dilemma...build or sort? Build or sort? Build or sort... Incidentally, I went out and popped $20 on a tripod. It does make a WORLD of difference--I'm still not bowled over by (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | | Re: Choosing a Digital Camera/New Photos Up —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | | | | | (...) I'm not sure I have anything worthy of being vaunted yet, but if you haven't seen it yet, I do have some creations up now at: (URL) Incidentally, I went out and popped $20 on a tripod. It does make a WORLD of (...) (25 years ago, 9-Dec-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | | | Re: Choosing a Digital Camera/New Photos Up —Tom Boucher
|
| | | | | | | | I just bought the Fuji MX-2900. Best features for the price but a bit expensive. think it was $899. Tom "Frank Filz" <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message news:FMGL1z.82L@lugnet.com... (...) (25 years ago, 10-Dec-99, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Choosing a Digital Camera/New Photos Up —Mike Walsh
|
| | | | | | Frank Filz wrote in message ... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) Here is the camera that I was telling Frank Filz about: (URL) is based on a chipset from SoundVision ((URL) my company, Mentor Graphics ((URL) designed. The camera is targeted at the entry (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Choosing a Digital Camera/New Photos Up —Frank Filz
|
| | | | | | (...) Too bad the production camera doesn't support the sample imaging which Mike originally pointed me to. It showed a nice macro shot of a quarter. This camera will not be able to do that (fixed focus 50cm to infinity). I'm sure the chip is (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | | | | Re: Choosing a Digital Camera/New Photos Up —Mike Walsh
|
| | | | | | Frank Filz wrote in message <3857A4FB.33FA@minds...ng.com>... [ ... snipped ... ] (...) I agree on Frank's point about the focal lenght, it is unfortunate. One other note, I poked around the Mustek web site some more and found that the camera will (...) (25 years ago, 15-Dec-99, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Choosing a Digital Camera/New Photos Up —Hari Wiguna
|
| | | | (...) You get what you you can afford. My limit was $300, and I got an Olympus D340R. I wish I have ZOOM, and I wish it can take better pictures without flash, but I'm happy with my purchase. There are better cameras, but they cost more. I think you (...) (25 years ago, 5-Dec-99, to lugnet.pirates, lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Choosing a Digital Camera/New Photos Up —Lindsay Frederick Braun
|
| | | | (...) Yeah, that's about what I'm thinking--macro doesn't come in until the $500 range. With a tripod (which I bought tonight), much of my arthritic shake should vanish. (...) my camera doesn't have an easily-located gamma key. So those ones aren't (...) (25 years ago, 5-Dec-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Choosing a Digital Camera/New Photos Up —Terry King
|
| | | | Just a Lego Photo comment; the Mavica is amazing with it's close-focus capability, and automatic white correction for fluorescent or halogen lights. I have taken a lot of close ups of electronics, etc and it's great. Look at: (URL) a quick example. (...) (25 years ago, 8-Dec-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
| | | | |
