|
|
 | | Re: top poster statistics
|
| (...) I know you spoke in jest, but actually, out of most of the 'heavy posters' (including yours truly), I find Larry's posts, for the most part, to be helpful and a good guide pointing in the right direction. Anywho, that's just what I noticed. (...) (22 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: top poster statistics
|
| (...) gives (...) get (...) Not a prestigious title by any means, but it does prove that you are full of hot air and long winded! ;-P -The one who modz the bricks (22 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: top poster statistics
|
| In lugnet.general, Larry Pieniazek wrote: <snip> (...) On it ++Lar... ;) Dave K (22 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: top poster statistics
|
| I bollixed up how I describe this... (...) (meaning: the list that gives the stats for 1999, the one that Tim Courtney was referring to in the post that caused Todd to generate post 1396) (...) I'm also not sure where 2003's list is either (meaning: (...) (22 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
| | | | | Re: top poster statistics
|
| (...) Nope. But I know how to look for stuff, a valuable skill to cultivate here. The search box is your friend. start here: (URL) get reminded that the list is called "top 1000 noisemakers" which is a singularly un-useful name for it as it's not (...) (22 years ago, 30-Oct-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.nntp)
|
|
