|
|
 | | The "LUGNET community" vs. the "LEGO community," and computer literacy
|
| (...) Hi Michael - (...) Not at all! In fact, I think as this thread continues, we're getting better and better responses, getting down to the meat of things. (...) There are many LEGO fans which fit that description. More than half of my train club (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
| | | | | Re: Constructive criticism vs. sugar coating (was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
|
| (...) Ummm...no, that would be me. (23 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
| | | | | Re: Constructive criticism vs. sugar coating (was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
|
| (...) Hi Tim, I've been reading this post with fascination and hope I'm not replying too late. First, thanks for bringing up such an interesting topic! For me, LUGNET is a great way to catch up on Lego-related news, and I consider myself a member of (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
| | | | | Constructive criticism vs. sugar coating (was: Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community)
|
| Hi Mike - Great comments! (...) Yep. I think it's not too cool when people are afraid to post constructive criticism. I think though, people only get upset at posters when they say something blatantly negative about a model - which discourages (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
| | | | | Re: Quantifying and Classifying the LEGO Community
|
| (...) My personal feeling is that there are some unwritten rules that strongly *discourage* talking about a LEGO model that someone posts. I certainly have the impression that no matter how well-intentioned, if there is a single sentence in a (...) (23 years ago, 18-Apr-03, to lugnet.general, lugnet.people, lugnet.fun.community)
|
|
