 | | Re: Password checks (was: Re: LUGNET Memberships)
|
| (...) I agree! In a cookie, you can put complete random garbage that only the authentication server knows how to interpret. And if certain bits contain an index, you can even use a one-time pad or other complex mapping to encrypt the data so that (...) (26 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
| (...) What do you think about this?-- (URL) (26 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
| (...) ahh.... at least they have that one little thing that means so much to me... FDIC insured. :) (26 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.admin.general, lugnet.people)
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
| (...) Actually I found PayPal's pw filter to be fairly stringent. KL (26 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
| | | | | Re: LUGNET Memberships
|
| (...) A combination of things... first, by then there will be more things in place that will matter more; second, the pw validator will very likely be less stringent; third, I predict that within the next nine months, a major online banking site (...) (26 years ago, 27-Sep-00, to lugnet.people, lugnet.admin.general)
|
|
