To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.peopleOpen lugnet.people in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 People / *4640 (-5)
  Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
 
(...) Agreed. It is also inaccurate in that (at least in my view, which may be flawed because I'm hetero) having a preference and acting on that preference are not at all the same thing. (and the distinction goes a lot deeper than that) However I (...) (22 years ago, 11-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt, FTX)
 
  Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
 
(...) (URL) "Come on, before the modern term of 'homosexual' was coined into English, everyone knew what a sodomite was..." 'Sodomite', in case you didn't know, is considered offensive and an insult. Even if this term wasn't used against someone, it (...) (22 years ago, 11-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt, FTX)
 
  Re: speaking of dead in the water...
 
(...) Spoiler It's the bricks that got small. Sunset Boulevard? George (22 years ago, 11-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt)
 
  speaking of dead in the water...
 
Hey I finally got around to setting up my account at brickshelf. Can anyone guess the gay icon movie that I have represented in this MOC? Being a filmmaker and therefore narcissistic I have put myself into the main character's, uh, role. The Chinese (...) (22 years ago, 11-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt)
 
  Re: Is lgbt dead in the water?
 
(...) I know I didn't read ALL of the postings for the prior discussion, so I may have missed the ones Saskia is saying she was bashed in, but of the ones I did read, I didn't see anyone 'gay bashing', using crude/derogatory slangs at anyone else. (...) (22 years ago, 11-Oct-04, to lugnet.people.lgbt)

Next Page:  5 more | 10 more | 20 more
Redisplay Messages:  All | Compact

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR