| | Rectangular 4,5V battery boxes - correction
|
|
The description of parts "x468*" on Peeron is incorrect. This post is only a try to make it better but somebody can disagree with me (that's why I am not posting it directly to Peeron). There were three main types of rectangular boxes for three 1,5V (...) (17 years ago, 5-Sep-07, to lugnet.parts, lugnet.inv)
|
|
| | Re: Plate 2x6 in year 1966?
|
|
(...) Considering what I have in mine and what Gary writes I wonder if the 2x6 plate could have been put in versions at the end of the set run to test it out or to use some they may have produced. Lego has done this several times. They also produced (...) (17 years ago, 2-Sep-07, to lugnet.inv, lugnet.parts)
|
|
| | Re: Plate 2x6 in year 1966?
|
|
The Inventory for 112-2 on Peeron is wrong! Please have a look at the inventory on Bricklink where it is correct. As I own this set I can confirm that it has no Plate 2 x 6. To see how it has to be build, look at my personal OMR on my webside (...) (17 years ago, 2-Sep-07, to lugnet.inv, lugnet.parts)
|
|
| | A monorail D'OH moment!
|
|
Hey all, While browsing the Ebay Lego monorail offerings just for grins, I looked at a picture with a part I didn't recognize. Then it hit me! If you can carefully remove this part: (URL) this part: (URL) you have half of a regular straight track (...) (17 years ago, 2-Sep-07, to lugnet.parts, lugnet.general)
|
|
| | Re: Plate 2x6 in year 1966?
|
|
(...) Gary: There is pat pend on the bottom. I looked through my other old 2x6 plates and none have the pat pend on them. I would say that you are correct that it was produced for a short time and then not produced for a number of years. John P (17 years ago, 31-Aug-07, to lugnet.inv, lugnet.parts)
|