|
|
 | | Re: What's in a part name? (WAS: 4679 Fall Spring Cleaning Bonus)
|
| (...) Ha. It is single, but obviously not concave. The "double concave" could be more clearly written "double, concave" or "double & concave". But I'm sure you knew that. DFTT, etc., etc. A truly double-concave part would be interesting -- only two (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.parts, FTX)
| | | | | Re: What's in a part name? (WAS: 4679 Fall Spring Cleaning Bonus)
|
| (...) Definitely studs, as even french people use, not mainly but only, this term. (...) AZMEP plates :) (...) Erling bricks :) (...) If you talk about System plates, I've read "one third brick" from a LEGO book. If you talk about Duplo plates you (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.parts, FTX)
| | | | | Re: What's in a part name? (WAS: 4679 Fall Spring Cleaning Bonus)
|
| (...) In the Brickopedia I got away from those two terms, since I agree with you... they can be confusing at times. :) For example, I called this: (URL) an 'Outer Corner' as in the way it's sometimes used to create the outer corner or edge of a (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.parts, FTX)
| | | | | Re: What's in a part name? (WAS: 4679 Fall Spring Cleaning Bonus)
|
| (...) I always had a problem with "convex" and "concave" (and, of course, their "doubled" bretheren). I've always associated those words with curved parts. But I can't really think of a better way to describe them.. Darrell (20 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.parts, FTX)
| | | | | What's in a part name? (WAS: 4679 Fall Spring Cleaning Bonus)
|
| (...) Part names. One of my favorite topics. :) While I was working on the (URL) for my book I spent a lot of time thinking about part naming and categorization. (...) I don't know that I'd label that name as "ridiculous". It may be outdated(1), but (...) (20 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.market.shopping, lugnet.parts, FTX)
| | | | | Re: A familiar uniform on a minifig MOC
|
| Hi Adrian (...) It is an extraordinaryily useful substance, isn't it? :) If you haven't seem my discussion on making custom elements, have a look here for lots more techniques and suchlike: (URL) When painting that small, do you use stencils or (...) (20 years ago, 14-Sep-05, to lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.loc.ca, lugnet.parts.custom, lugnet.parts.mod, lugnet.town)
| | | | | Re: A familiar uniform on a minifig MOC
|
| Excellent work! I've never thought of using epoxy putty to build up a custom lego element, but it seems perfectly suited to the job - I do use it for all sorts of other household repairs. Love that stuff. When painting that small, do you use (...) (20 years ago, 12-Sep-05, to lugnet.build.minifigs, lugnet.loc.ca, lugnet.parts.custom, lugnet.parts.mod, lugnet.town)
| | | | | Re: A familiar uniform on a minifig MOC
|
| (...) Thanks for saying. :) I've had a lot of inspiration and education from various online sources over the years, and this sort of thing is my way of trying to put a little bit of value back in circulation. It's also an attempt to provide a bit of (...) (20 years ago, 10-Sep-05, to lugnet.parts.custom, lugnet.parts.mod)
| | | | | Re: Chirality
|
| (...) Well, if you want to show the lone pair of electrons you could. (URL) is a link to a pdf. I didn't think that sending you a 385 kB e-mail message was sucha great idea:) I thought the model was a neat idea. Unfortunately, one of the reviewers (...) (20 years ago, 10-Sep-05, to lugnet.build.schleim, lugnet.parts, lugnet.edu)
| | | | | Re: Chirality
|
| (...) Excellent Chris, what did you use for the bonds and what did you use for the atoms. And were you also able to show double covalent bonds. (which is something that would be hard to show) I would love to read the article if you want. I get so (...) (20 years ago, 9-Sep-05, to lugnet.build.schleim, lugnet.parts, lugnet.edu)
|
|
