 | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
| Huh? This is about the strangest post I have ever seen. Looking at the last post about WAMALUG there are 15 replies (certainly some of those people aren't WAMALUG members. Sometimes people have alot going on and do not post right away. Further, (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
| I for one really enjoyed your setup. I especially enjoyed Dan's pics. However, did not post a response because: - I try not to do "me to" posts - Although I am slowly getting interested, I haven't yet gone over the edge and actually purchased a Lego (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
| (...) well, I, for one, hate counters. Besides, I have the statistics from the web server, and I know that there were almost 1000 hits just to the index page. I know people are watching and from what I can tell likeing our layout. I think Jeff was (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
| Well, by now you know that people DO care. I personally have been following all the posts from your show and found the pictures quite enjoyable. However, I didn't have anything particularly interesting to say, so I didn't post anything. I've found (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
| (...) Generally frowned on as a "no-no" but, ME TOO! ^_^; I think Sproat said it best, you can only post "wow, looks great, wish I could do that" so many times per week. ^_^; (26 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
| (...) Well, I'm not one of those who asked about DCC, but I think your show was great. I appreciate your posts, and I really enjoyed the pictures. Excellent job, people! I don't usually post praise about shows, and there are many others like me in (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
| | | | | Re: GATS pictures (and MPGs!), first day
|
| Author! Author! (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.publish, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains, lugnet.general)
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
| The pix are great, thanks for sharing! I especially liked the little movies, that is the coolest. Your setup makes my measly little train (which I worked on all weekend) look pitiful. Keep sharing pictures with us, we really like them! (especially (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
| (...) Guilty as charged. There are only so many times I feel I can post "wow, looks great, wish I could do that" per week. (...) Never crossed my mind. (...) Well, I for one can see that you guys are artists, and therefore need your egos pumped up (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
| (...) I think we might have been hoping for a longer conversation than the one we got, (not to speak for Jeff, but that's what I think he was saying and I echo'd). No, we aren't in it for the adulation, just the conversation. It is still my (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
| Actually, I had numerous questions about the DCC setup, but I saw in a post that some information was going to be posted about it, so I held my questions until it was posted, but here goes: How much labor (time) is required to convert a Lego Train (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
| (...) Oh, and another thing. DO NOT do things because you want adulation from Lugnetters... do them because you want to. Did you have fun at the show? Did the people who came have fun? GMLTC labored in obscurity for years (and Conan for years before (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
| (...) Not from me. I've just been time and connectivity challenged over the last week. The pics I saw (in the brief moments I've had) are amazing. Sorting layouts into tabletop(everyone else) vs legomodular(GMLTC so far, maybe BAYLUG soon), you guys (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
| (...) Here's a thread in lugnet.trains that you can get your teeth into: (URL) Cook, WAMALUG DCC and table construction master, talks about DCC, and implications from TLC, (which, if they follow their usual pattern, will not be a compatible or (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
| I respond to anything that I see and find interesting, but although taking part in another long DCC thread, I don't remember reading any threads about successful DCC. Can you point me to some Lugnet messages or web urls? -- Paul Davidson, aka Tinman (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
| Jeff, Well, I am looking at the pictures now, I have been severely behind on e-mail, etc. From what I have seen so far, it is awesome, the big crane is mind-blowing. Great job everyone! Scott S. ___...___ Scott E. Sanburn-> ssanburn@cleanweb.net (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.org)
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
| Hi Jeff, I must say, I couldn't check out the display earlier. I did now, only a little part (no time, sorry) and it looks very awesome. I don't think everyone is apathetic - just, as Richard said, don't think your egos need stroking... :) After (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
| I can understand your frustration. My own view is that anytime you post something it seems to be fairly random as far as the response. I've posted some things that I didn't think were all that important and had 32 e-mail replies and generated a lot (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
| | | | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
| (...) tons (...) one (...) Well, I care. But then, I suppose I would. Seriously though, you'd get more attention out of some Lugnet readers if you said how great Mega Bloks are. Maybe they are just in awe with the layout. Or maybe they think we (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
| | | | | Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
| Why has there been such apathy towards Wamalug's train shows? In the past month, there have been a total of nine messages from non-members about our setups. There has been absolutly no discussion, no critiques, and very little praise. Do you all (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains, lugnet.trains.org, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org)
|
|
