 | | Re: Meeting this Friday —Stephen F. Roberts
|
| | | (...) ...The archive is not publik, but since membership is not controlled, all someone would have to do is join and look. But on the flip side, our meetings tend to be in a community room of a condo building. The building is controlled so a not (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jun-00, to lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: Meeting this Friday —Richard W. Schamus
|
| | | | | (...) so, (...) we (...) egroups.com archive, (...) someone would (...) a community (...) as (...) Not unless someone wanted to have people show up at their house, "Come on over to my house, and I'll show you the virtues of clones..." Rich -- Have (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jun-00, to lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | | Re: Meeting this Friday —Will Middelaer
|
| | | | | | (...) Now that would be like the Black Hand! ;-) Will (24 years ago, 15-Jun-00, to lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | | | |
| | | | | Re: Meeting this Friday —Kevin Loch
|
| | | | (...) so, (...) we (...) egroups.com archive, (...) someone would (...) a community (...) as (...) It depends on the individual who occupies the address. I certainly have no problem giving out my address. It's been on my whois info for years, and I (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jun-00, to lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: Meeting this Friday —James J. Trobaugh
|
| | | | In lugnet.org.us.wamalug, Kevin Loch writes: <snip> (...) If we're not careful we here in the States won't have that option much longer, every day the liberals seem to find another way to try to take take away our right to protect ourselves. People (...) (24 years ago, 15-Jun-00, to lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| | | | |
