 | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
|
I attempted to add some info to Chris' comments. "Christopher Tracey" <ctracey@wamalug.org> wrote in message news:38BE7C58.C2B336...lug.org... (...) drain (...) Technically we could have run 10 trains, but it only has 5 throttles, so you have to (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
|
I attempted to add some info to Chris' comments. "Christopher Tracey" <ctracey@wamalug.org> wrote in message news:38BE7C58.C2B336...lug.org... (...) drain (...) Technical we could have run 10 trains, but it only has 5 throttles, so you have to (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
|
(...) ...Most of my stuff is kind of pitiful too... but its amazing what a whole bunch of little things from different people piled together can get to. Just a building here, a train car there... an idea for placing some random minifigs... ...Like (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| |
| | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
|
(...) ...Yes they do!!! I'm insecure and all... :-) ...you can go back to ignoring me now... wubwub stephen f roberts wildlink.com lugnet #160 (26 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| |
| | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
|
(...) ...clearly a new feature needed on the lugnet newswindow... a button to automatically post a 'wow, looks great' message :-) ...you can go back to ignoring me now... wubwub stephen f roberts wildlink.com lugnet #160 (26 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| |
| | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
|
(...) I think 'definately inspired' is a better term here. :) (...) of the coolest things I ever saw. Unfortunately, I only had 4 technic half-pins w/stud at the time and was also lacking in the train department. I built this one a few months ago, (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| |
| | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
|
(...) Chris, I looked at your SD40-2 last week shortly after you announced it. I was busy at the time and couldn't write any comments. By the time I had the time to write comments, I couldn't view your page(1) and most everything I wanted to say (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
|
Hi Mike, (...) We had five trains and six(maybe seven) moters running on the layout without any significant problems. Our DCC system could only support five addresses. (...) My GP-35 had two moters attached to it, both assigned to the same address. (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| |
| | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
|
(...) Can't speak for anyone else but here's why I hardly ever comment on them. A) I'm not a trainhead B) I normally look at all the pics, and even call my wife in to see them, and amazed at how cool they are, but really have very little to offer in (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| |
| | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
|
(...) tons (...) one (...) Woah there. Just because there is no discussion about an event doesn't mean that people don't care, or are not impressed. There are many, many reasons why there might not be discussion about something. People might have (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
