 | | Re: new train layout —Shaun Sullivan
|
| | | (...) could easily fill this up already, and still be crowded in some areas. I do like the idea of the figure-eight layout though ... if we have permission to use more room (Eric, any reply to that e-mail?), we could add 6 tables to make another (...) (23 years ago, 10-Dec-01, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: new train layout —Jonathan Dallas
|
| | | | I made some changes to my layout. (URL) new plan has a 2x8 space for Tom. But I couldn't quite make a continuous 2x7 for eric, but it's close. Yes, if I move my factory you would have a 2x7, but I'm going to be selfish. :-p To address Shaun's (...) (23 years ago, 13-Dec-01, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: new train layout —David Eaton
|
| | | | | (...) Also 2 extra sets of points! (9 instead of 5?) DaveE (23 years ago, 13-Dec-01, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| | | | | |
| | | | | | Re: new train layout —Eric Kingsley
|
| | | | I actually did this just after the show but havn't had time to put it up. I did a couple of layouts. Both of these need some work. Both are also at the largest size (6 additional tables) that we discussed but could be downsized fairly easily. The (...) (23 years ago, 13-Dec-01, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: new train layout —Joe Comeau
|
| | | | "Eric Kingsley" <kingsley@nelug.org> wrote in message news:GoAJyq.MJ5@lugnet.com... (...) I (...) the (...) downsized (...) has (...) with (...) possibilities. (...) the (...) arn't (...) Main (...) And let's not forget about room for the amusement (...) (23 years ago, 15-Dec-01, to lugnet.org.us.nelug)
|
| | | | |
