Subject:
|
Re: module tables
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us.nclug
|
Date:
|
Fri, 31 Mar 2000 00:54:09 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2381 times
|
| |
|
|
I vote for PNLTC style tables for a couple of reasons:
1) Cost
2) It is a reasonable standard
3) One of my co-workers already built a couple
I actually had a message composed for the thread in lugnet.trains but it was
lost along with the rest of my hard drive when it crashed last week while I
was in San Jose.
Mike - mike_walsh@mindspring.com
"Frank Filz" <ffilz@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:38E352E0.33FA@mindspring.com...
> James Beerman wrote:
> >
> > Did anyone see the post in trains about module tables?
> >
> > Are we going to follow that?
> > I'm not sure I have enough bricks to do one.
>
> I think we had pretty much settled on the PNLTC tables. I probably have
> enough bricks for one, maybe two LEGO-Modular tables.
>
> --
> Frank Filz
>
> -----------------------------
> Work: mailto:ffilz@us.ibm.com (business only please)
> Home: mailto:ffilz@mindspring.com
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: module tables
|
| (...) I think we had pretty much settled on the PNLTC tables. I probably have enough bricks for one, maybe two LEGO-Modular tables. (25 years ago, 30-Mar-00, to lugnet.org.us.nclug)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
