To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.us.nclugOpen lugnet.org.us.nclug in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / United States / NCLUG / 239
238  |  240
Subject: 
Re: clearance on side of tracks
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.us.nclug
Date: 
Wed, 13 Jun 2001 15:30:39 GMT
Viewed: 
2323 times
  
My rule of thumb is to attach 2x3 bricks to the inside of a curve's ties
and make sure that the building comes no closer than that (i.e., the
building is always 2 studs away from the inside curve.) The outside may
require even more clearance, but I don't know what the measurement is.
I'd count on 2 studs if not 3.

Cary

"sheree rosenkrantz" <srosez@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:GEvJEC.4Mx@lugnet.com...
Any suggestions on a general rule as to how much space is prudent to
leave
on either side of track for a variety of trains to easily negotiate
around
curves?  This is for NCLUG/NCLTC's upcoming GATS.  I am trying to plan
my
plot layout.  I have one building which I think will end up being almost
ontop of an outer side curve of track.  I know this won't do.

tia,
sheree



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: clearance on side of tracks
 
(...) Interesting. I'd assert that the clearance needed on the inside is a function of the width of rolling stock and the maximum distance kingpin to kingpin (the longer a car, the more the center overhangs the inside of the curve). I'd assert that (...) (23 years ago, 13-Jun-01, to lugnet.org.us.nclug, lugnet.trains)

3 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR