 | | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Language snobs(was: MichLUG Meeting - March 2nd, 2002 - Scott's wrap-up)
|
|
(...) AFAIAC you certainly may... :-) Were you planning on doing so? :-) If so, go ahead. :-) (...) No, you mayn't. :-) I tilt at too many windmills as it is. But thanks for thinking of me, just the same. :-) (...) I kind of like the manifold ways (...) (23 years ago, 7-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: Language snobs(was: MichLUG Meeting - March 2nd, 2002 - Scott's wrap-up)
|
|
Amy & All, (...) Amy, I find this last post insulting, and if you have serious problems with my writing skills, I suggest you should have contacted me off-line. I would rather have a few mistakes on various writings and summaries rather subjects (...) (23 years ago, 7-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: Language snobs(was: MichLUG Meeting - March 2nd, 2002 - Scott's wrap-up)
|
|
Larry & All, (...) Ha ha. While we need some proof-reading on various subjects, such as the website, this subject could have been dealt in a better manner. Scott S. -- (23 years ago, 7-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Language snobs(was: MichLUG Meeting - March 2nd, 2002 - Scott's wrap-up)
|
|
(...) on (...) else's (...) earlier. (...) and (...) time (...) of (...) on (...) ???...???!!!! :( (23 years ago, 7-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: Language snobs(was: MichLUG Meeting - March 2nd, 2002 - Scott's wrap-up)
|
|
(...) It should be noted, that as the person responsible for the website, I did not find Amy's previous post to be insulting (nor this one.) I am aware of my shortcomings, and I welcome MichLUGers pointing out grammatical and spelling errors on the (...) (23 years ago, 7-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | Re: Language snobs(was: MichLUG Meeting - March 2nd, 2002 - Scott's wrap-up)
|
|
(...) Mebbe. But personally I enjoy your wrapups immensely and wouldn't change a thing about them as posted here. They may well benefit from a review before being preserved for posterity, but happily, one could argue that they'd lose their charm. (...) (23 years ago, 7-Mar-02, to lugnet.org.us.michlug)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
