To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.us.laflrcOpen lugnet.org.us.laflrc in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / United States / LafLRC / 43
42  |  44
Subject: 
Re: GBC Train crossing, IndyLUG & Chibots
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.us.laflrc
Date: 
Fri, 16 Sep 2005 18:13:05 GMT
Viewed: 
7020 times
  
On Thu, September 15, 2005 2:58 pm, Brian Davis wrote:
> In lugnet.org.us.laflrc, Steve Hassenplug wrote:
> 
> > maybe we could run them on separate loops that
> > cross over each other.  Then, at each intersection,
> > we could have the same type of "Transfer Segment"
> > sensors we currently have.
> 
>    Even better, make the transfer sensors and waiting points as far away as
> possible while still preserving train-non-crashingness. That way we could run it
> so the two trains are often (always?) headed for the crossing at the same time,
> but never *quite* collide. Hopefully (evil grin...)

Hmm.  A very interesting idea just came up.

Given that we want to integrate a GBC into a train layout, I just had a cool idea
that we could run a non-GBC train THROUGH the GBC.

All I need is a sensor to detect where the other train is (or know when it's in a
"danger zone") then I can stop the GBC train (or speed it up!?) to clear a train
crossing.

So, the area I'm working with is 10x6 baseplates.  It could be 10x8, if needed.

The outside baseplate will have a non-GBC train loop (which also goes elsewhere on
the layout), and I'm thinking about putting the GBC train on the same baseplate, and
run it as a circle outside the GBC (turn the GBC inside-out).

Is that clear?  So, we have an inside area of about 4x8 baseplates.


Also, at the November 13th event in Chicago (Chibots) there will be a "Robot Art"
competition.  Yes, it's another good place to set-up a GBC.

Steve



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: GBC Train crossing
 
(...) Even better, make the transfer sensors and waiting points as far away as possible while still preserving train-non-crashingness. That way we could run it so the two trains are often (always?) headed for the crossing at the same time, but never (...) (21 years ago, 15-Sep-05, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)

3 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR