|
|
 | | Re: 3T
|
| In lugnet.org.us.laflrc, Brian Davis wrote: <snip> (...) I don't know if I'm using the most efficient method either, but from what I have found... Tasks are run in parallel. If I start a task (the scan task) my main code will continue to run at the (...) (19 years ago, 3-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
| | | | | Re: 3T
|
| I'm not sure about the RCX, but with some languages, things like events, or other tasks, will not start executing until the current task gives up the processor. (like in a wait) Here's a suggestion that should avoid the delay... (...) ... (...) * If (...) (19 years ago, 3-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
| | | | | Re: 3T
|
| (...) I ran mine last night at a "family science night" for a school. Big hit, although I *absolutely* need error checking in my code (playing against a robot is easy - playing against a 5-year-old, with a couple of 4-year-olds constantly hitting (...) (19 years ago, 3-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
| | | | | 3T
|
| Well, I've had some time on my hands, and being totally unhappy with my 3T robot I decided a re-build was in order. Probably an 85% - 90% rebuild. About the only thing that wasn't touched was my cube magazine & the dropper mechanism. Everything else (...) (19 years ago, 3-Mar-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
| | | | | Re: NEIRG
|
| (...) I sent in entries for John, Steve, Brian, and Kerby last night. Between the 5 of us I think there are 15 robots for the competition...not to mention the 3T display. Brian - are you planning to stay at my house on Friday night? I believe Steve, (...) (19 years ago, 10-Feb-06, to lugnet.org.us.laflrc)
|
|
