To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.us.indylugOpen lugnet.org.us.indylug in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / United States / IndyLUG / 296
295  |  297
Subject: 
Re: Motorized point
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.org.us.indylug
Date: 
Sat, 21 Dec 2002 04:02:47 GMT
Viewed: 
3512 times
  
In lugnet.org.us.indylug, Brian B. Alano writes:
> 
> > Brian,
> > 
> > I'm not having much luck with the switcher.  It definitely worked
> > better, but it still failed a lot of the time (3 out of 4).  I took some
> > of the shell off so I could watch it and I think the biggest problem is
> > that there are too many joints and too much play in the cam mechanism
> > for it to work correctly.
> 
> It's been much better than 95% for me. I wonder if there's something
> wrong in my drawing. Sounds like there's too much play somewhere. This
> wasn't a problem for me. The only problem I has was the base lifting off
> the track. A 2 x 6 plate over the top of the base next to and parallel
> with the track helped a great deal with this.
> 
> One thing I noticed when assembling it is that the perpendicular axle
> connector with two holes can tilt to a lower position and still fit in
> the housing. IIRC, it should set a few degrees off horizontal (exactly
> horizontal would provide better action, but that proved elusive to do).
> Once in the proper position, it stayed there (at least until the base
> separated from the track.)

I'll take a look and see if that is the issue.  Hopefully, it will work.

> 
> > 
> > BTW, where are we with the control software?
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Steve
> 
> It works nicely, sans roundtable/roundhouse software. That is to say,
> the RCX to hardware interface does. All necessary functionality is
> there. An RCX to human interface is functional, but not exactly usable.
> I'm going to put something together in Java, I think, for the user
> interface.

Yippee!

Sounds great,
SteveM



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Motorized point
 
(...) It's been much better than 95% for me. I wonder if there's something wrong in my drawing. Sounds like there's too much play somewhere. This wasn't a problem for me. The only problem I has was the base lifting off the track. A 2 x 6 plate over (...) (24 years ago, 20-Dec-02, to lugnet.org.us.indylug)

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR