 | | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
|
On Thu, 2 Mar 2000 17:14:33 GMT Christopher Tracey <ctracey@wamalug.org> wrote concerning 'Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)': (...) I guess it's my job to take responsability for that one - I was driving the shunter (I (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
|
(...) Could you imagine the mess ten trains would have made? :) It was bad enough with three trains, four trains was crazy, and five was plain insane. We had some spectacular crashes, the scariest of which was Rich's shunter doing a full-speed (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
|
OK, now where's that website with all the info on how to build it? ;-) I hope you do a "DCC for Dummies", an EE I am NOT. (...) -- | Tom Stangl, Technical Support Netscape Communications Corp | Please do not associate my personal views with my (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
|
I attempted to add some info to Chris' comments. "Christopher Tracey" <ctracey@wamalug.org> wrote in message news:38BE7C58.C2B336...lug.org... (...) drain (...) Technically we could have run 10 trains, but it only has 5 throttles, so you have to (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
|
I attempted to add some info to Chris' comments. "Christopher Tracey" <ctracey@wamalug.org> wrote in message news:38BE7C58.C2B336...lug.org... (...) drain (...) Technical we could have run 10 trains, but it only has 5 throttles, so you have to (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)
|
| |
| | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
|
(...) ...Most of my stuff is kind of pitiful too... but its amazing what a whole bunch of little things from different people piled together can get to. Just a building here, a train car there... an idea for placing some random minifigs... ...Like (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| |
| | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
|
(...) ...Yes they do!!! I'm insecure and all... :-) ...you can go back to ignoring me now... wubwub stephen f roberts wildlink.com lugnet #160 (26 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| |
| | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
|
(...) ...clearly a new feature needed on the lugnet newswindow... a button to automatically post a 'wow, looks great' message :-) ...you can go back to ignoring me now... wubwub stephen f roberts wildlink.com lugnet #160 (26 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| |
| | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
|
(...) I think 'definately inspired' is a better term here. :) (...) of the coolest things I ever saw. Unfortunately, I only had 4 technic half-pins w/stud at the time and was also lacking in the train department. I built this one a few months ago, (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug)
|
| |
| | Re: Apathy? (was: WAMALUG's GATS Layout was a huge success!)
|
|
(...) Chris, I looked at your SD40-2 last week shortly after you announced it. I was busy at the time and couldn't write any comments. By the time I had the time to write comments, I couldn't view your page(1) and most everything I wanted to say (...) (26 years ago, 2-Mar-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.org.us, lugnet.org.us.wamalug, lugnet.trains)
|
