Subject:
|
Re: How to handel minors in "LUG's" was (Re: NELUG Turns 50!!)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.us
|
Date:
|
Thu, 18 Nov 1999 22:00:26 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2231 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.org.us, James Brown writes:
> In lugnet.loc.us.me, Eric Kingsley writes:
> > I think this problem can possibly be solved using some of the ideas I have
> > stated above. Have clear cut Adult only meetings and invite kids to more
> > public all ages meetings.
>
> I would suggest that it's easier (and possibly better all around) to simply
> have all ages meetings, but make it clear that children have to be accompanied
> by an adult.
At what age would you say children *don't* have to be accompanied by an adult?
Sixteen? Do you know of a legal basis for that kind of decision? Of course,
we wouldn't want any child to come without permission.
Jeff
P.S. I'm wondering because this came up in some of WAMALUG's recent
discusions, too.
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
Message is in Reply To:
35 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|