 | | Re: Request for membership cancellation
|
|
(...) Anthony, The troubling thing about this is - if you wanted to just cancel your membership, emailing Joe or posting to the SciBrick webserv would probably have been the best route. However, you've laid some fairly offensive accusations (...) (21 years ago, 14-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.scibrick)
|
| |
| | Re: Request for membership cancellation
|
|
(...) I tend to agree. (...) In my view it would be best if this entire thread just went away (including this post that I am typing) and I am sure Frand and I'd be happy to make that happen if all the participants chose to ask for their posts to be (...) (21 years ago, 14-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.scibrick)
|
| |
| | Re: Request for membership cancellation
|
|
(...) I agree with Lenny on this. Sorry for being late on this, gang. I did send a note to Anthony concerning this personally, as I thought it would be appropriate. Of course, I completely forgot about the thread here. Simply put, Anthony has his (...) (21 years ago, 14-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.scibrick)
|
| |
| | curatorship and curatorship attributes
|
|
(...) Joe: If you want, you can also send notes to Frank or myself, we can change curatorships too. A note from Felix (copying you) at this point would clearly document the desired transition. The way your post reads, it could be leaving the (...) (21 years ago, 14-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.scibrick, lugnet.admin.curators, lugnet.admin.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Request for membership cancellation
|
|
(...) Hmm... You talk as if discussion is a BAD thing... Heavens lets not invite discussion and free thinking ;) --Anthony (21 years ago, 14-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.scibrick)
|
| |
| | Re: Request for membership cancellation
|
|
(...) Discussion ensues when attention is drawn. And calling a group of your "peers" "elitist, stifling, and anal retentive", certainly counts. Especially when by not allowing discussion, you allow no chance for said group of "peers" to defend your (...) (21 years ago, 15-Jan-04, to lugnet.org.scibrick)
|
