To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.org.scibrickOpen lugnet.org.scibrick in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Organizations / SciBrick / 109
108  |  110
Subject: 
Re: Proposed standard for Mini/Micro Moonbase
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.space, lugnet.org.scibrick
Date: 
Sun, 18 Jan 2004 16:18:03 GMT
Viewed: 
4 times
  
Very cool, Bram ! I was looking at the 8x8 idea and thinking it was
great, but that it was too small for a lot of detail.  It's just a bit
smaller than Anders Isaksson's stuff, but big enough to be interesting.
-JSM

Bram Lambrecht wrote:
Here's a standard I came up with for a 16x16 module size.  This allows quite a
bit more detail than the 8x8 standard, yet it's still small enough to allow many
modules with limited pieces.¬
<<http://www.brickshelf.com/gallery/bl/Photos/Ideas/Mini-Moonbase-2/std.jpg>>¬
The corridor is a 2x2 round brick and plate, centered on the 16 studs with a 2
stud offset.  [Remember than 5 plates = 2 studs!]¬
<SNIP>



Message is in Reply To:
  Proposed standard for Mini/Micro Moonbase
 
Here's a standard I came up with for a 16x16 module size. This allows quite a bit more detail than the 8x8 standard, yet it's still small enough to allow many modules with limited pieces. (URL) The corridor is a 2x2 round brick and plate, centered (...) (21 years ago, 18-Jan-04, to lugnet.space, lugnet.org.scibrick, FTX)  

2 Messages in This Thread:

Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR