Subject:
|
Re: Gantry EOAT Complete
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Thu, 10 May 2001 22:54:17 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
451 times
|
| |
|
|
"Jeff Elliott" <jeffe@telepres.com> wrote in message
news:3AFABAEF.251FFF49@telepres.com...
> > http://www.oxford.net/~hendryjr/train1/
> >
> > (eoat_.jpg series)
> Nice work, man!
Thanks. :)
> A question - I take it that this setup assumes not only the L-feet
> on the container bottom, but that there's an extra plate thickness
> gap between the container bottom and the car?
Yeah - Any container cars you want loaded/unloaded have to have the
container elevated off the flatbed by one flat plate thickness - which I
don't think is an issue, because you have to have those flats there anyway
(from what I understand - see the guide_.jpg series for details on that...).
Iain
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Gantry EOAT Complete
|
| (...) Nice work, man! A question - I take it that this setup assumes not only the L-feet on the container bottom, but that there's an extra plate thickness gap between the container bottom and the car? (...) Excellent. Jeff E (23 years ago, 10-May-01, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
4 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
