 | | some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
any ideas on how to improve accuracy when your accuracy is not repeatable???? Half the times the block is perfect but the other times it is always different, where do i look? its not like the inaccurate bloc is always in the same position the wrong (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
"Chris Magno" <cmagno@rogers.com> wrote in message news:3C6FF1BE.D77547...ers.com... (...) Use hard stops! Yay! Use five RCX's and have a hard stop for every position that the motor just slams it into. (...) Make it go slower, then it will be more (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
(...) ARE YOU NUTS!!! slower is for Bruce. Speed is where it is at. I still need to shave off 2 seconds to beat Ka-on. :) Chris Pretend this says something funny (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
"Chris Magno" <cmagno@rogers.com> wrote in message news:3C6FF5CB.ED778E...ers.com... (...) Yes...? (...) This is why we should not have been posting our times. Argh. Try your best to make it fast. You should decide for yourself how much shaving is (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
(...) I agree whole-heartedly with Iain, SLOW that thing down….If ever there was a time for worm to 40t this is it! Bruce (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
(...) There isn't an answer--if your accuracy isn't tight, it won't ever be repeatable unless you fix it somewhere else downstream of the system (ie, a positioner chute like Derek's original idea for example) The block that is off its position is (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
(...) you have a anti-X time and it is BAD...... i can hear it in your voice. -- Chris Pretend this says something funny (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
(...) this is what I thought. argh. Chris Pretend this says something funny (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
If it makes you feel any better, I've been struggling with the same thing myself. My ability to get the XY accuracy down to the top of a tooth IS slowing it down and worse, (like Calum said) it causes a vibration in the EOAT. I don’t have a time (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
(...) I also have some problems with accuracy, but I am gona igonore it since there is little I can do without a complete redesign. The thing has enough momentum to push the whole 48x48 board around, there is little I can do in software. And don't (...) (23 years ago, 17-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
1110 1010 1110 0000 humm, Ka-on, thank you for this pattern. here are a few that i use to test: 1111 1100 1000 1000 i called this on the stealth bomber. It forced a lot of diagonals for testing. As well, this is simple but a good test of distance (...) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
"Chris Magno" <cmagno@rogers.com> wrote in message news:3C704CF8.B1B0E7...ers.com... (...) Yeah, if you're into the whole "vanishing block" routine. Dork :) Iain (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
(...) OK, OK, it was a typo. this leads to an interesting question. how well does your robot handle less or more then 8 blocks? Chris Pretend that Iain did not call me a Dork. (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
(...) I don't know about that...I've always admired Iain’s straight-forward and accurate views (at least when they pertain to you). Bruce (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
(...) I have a problem, normally At the robot contests, I tend to be the person who publicly and very loudly proclaim the GRAND winner at the end of the day. Bruce, in 5 days, when I take home the gold... I will feel just a tiny bit bad about (...) (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Chris Magno writes: <snip> (...) Dave Pretend that comments from the Peanut Gallery actually mean something... (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: some stuff... robot accuracy
|
|
"Bruce Sheridan" <bruce.sheridan@cogeco.ca> wrote in message news:Grpqvn.9Gv@lugnet.com... (...) Ha! Iain (23 years ago, 18-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
