 | | Re: Blue screen of death
|
|
(...) He must have a cold or something and has accidentally over-medicated himself. Either that or he's just toooo lazy to fix his own code :) (I have to remember to insert these little smiley faces now that I know that our posts are being read (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Blue screen of death
|
|
(...) yeah...and don't forget to include your tag-line at the bottom, so everyone will have no doubt that you submitted the posting....especially if it involves any good ribbing of Chris... :) Benjamin Medinets pretend that Chris has a full (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Blue screen of death
|
|
(...) like I'd even give that little PUNK KID the chance to tell me my "robot sucks." HA, if he or his dopple ganger (sp) even open his mouth I'm gonna WHACK him. With some help from (someone) It was pointed out that variable = variable + 1 is just (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Blue screen of death
|
|
(...) Or he truely doesn't understand his own code and doesn't want to admit it.... :) :) :0 :) Matthias Jetleb (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Blue screen of death
|
|
variable++ is probably even better for a simple increment (variable-- for decrement). Of course, the compiler may recognize this and translate "++" and "+=1" as the same. (...) (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Blue screen of death
|
|
(...) Well if its a good compiler, v = v + 1; v += 1; v++; v -= -1; s = 1; v += s; would all be equivalent. Derek (23 years ago, 14-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| |
| | Re: Blue screen of death
|
|
Derek Raycraft wrote: > (...) Well, NQC isn't. I dont think it optimises code like that. (23 years ago, 15-Feb-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
