 | | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general —Larry Pieniazek
| | | | In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Calum Tsang writes: <snip> (...) But the problem is that she shouldn't HAVE to say so each and every time. LUGNET is a community. As such, community members ought to be able to help each other out in conforming to the (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | | | | | | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general —David Koudys
| | | | | (...) Oooh, my second posting to a Larry post (too bad it has to be about this issue :( for I appreciate Larry, and Tim and everyone I've had dialogues with and or/read on LUGNet... In lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto, Tim Courtney writes: (...) Both are (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | | | | | | | | Re: use of anagram fun is bad in lugnet.general —Allan Bedford
| | | | | (...) I don't wish to add any fuel to this mixture, but do want to make a point that might help present another point of view. I read LUGNET through the web interface almost 100% of the time. I have no filtering enabled, so I see every newsgroup. I (...) (22 years ago, 16-Jan-02, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
| | | | | | |
