Subject:
|
Re: Definition required
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto
|
Date:
|
Thu, 20 Jul 2006 19:54:07 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
690 times
|
| |
|
|
Chris Magno wrote:
> When the rules say:
>
>
> "The opponent has "lost" the rope such that it is no longer within its
> volume."
>
>
> if the rope still has ONE end of it "in" the bot; is that ok? this rule
> means (to me) that the free end of the rope is no linger IN your bot.
> but if the rope is now only in ONE side of your bot, is that still
> considered "in its volume"?
I would say yes.
Derek
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Definition required
|
| When the rules say: "The opponent has "lost" the rope such that it is no longer within its volume." if the rope still has ONE end of it "in" the bot; is that ok? this rule means (to me) that the free end of the rope is no linger IN your bot. but if (...) (18 years ago, 20-Jul-06, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
3 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
