 | | Re: rtlToronto19: Balance of Power and other upcoming events —Rob Antonishen
|
| | | (...) B has the advantage if and only if the assumption that the robots move at the same rate holds true. Assuming that the two robots are are similar in terms of battery and motor configurations, i.e. can deliver the same power, robot A in the (...) (20 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | |
| | | | | Re: rtlToronto19: Balance of Power and other upcoming events —Iain Hendry
|
| | | | (...) Right. I made that assumption to prove that even if both robots are the same distance from the fulcrum, they are no longer in balance (a neutral win state). (...) I think you missed my point entirely. You were saying that by adding a mass to (...) (20 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
| | | | | | Re: rtlToronto19: Balance of Power and other upcoming events —Rob Antonishen
|
| | | | (...) It is entirely possible that I missed your point entirely :) But I do realize that the balancing will only work at one state. My thought was that if the goal is to get your side tipped down a certain distance, than just having a large bot mass (...) (20 years ago, 1-Mar-05, to lugnet.org.ca.rtltoronto)
|
| | | | |
